Articles
Daily News and Information for the Mortgage Loan Originator
FCC Begins Long Awaited Crack Down on Do Not Call Violators: Lessons from the Dynasty Mortgage Case – Part 1
Monday, April 11, 2005 - By Barry Kaye, Esq.

Last month the FCC, in what may be a watershed case for the mortgage industry, held that if a mortgage originator does not have its own full-fledged process whereby it ensures and documents that the leads its calling are not on the Do-Not-Call (“DNC”) Registry and instead relies upon a mortgage lead broker or aggregator’s representation that it “scrubs” the leads it sells as the basis for believing its fine to call someone, this alone “does not evince a process that complies with the safe harbor requirement.” [1] In straightforward language this means that, buying a lead from a third party that claims to check or “scrub” its lists against the DNC Registry, is not on its own sufficient to keep an originator out of hot water if in fact the lead was out of bounds and should never have been called in the first place.

Dynasty Mortgage is an important case for the mortgage industry that should be on the reading list of every mortgage company owner and their compliance team. The case details how a mortgage company employing marketing techniques routinely used in the mortgage industry – such as voice message advertising – found itself facing a potentially business ending fine as a result of making a mere 70 misplaced calls. Dynasty’s defense, which was completely dismissed by the FCC, was in a nutshell: Our lead broker told us we could call them. Nope, not good enough; Dynasty please make your check for $770,000.00 payable to the FCC and mail it to the Forfeiture Collection section in Chicago within 30 days. And – if you’re still in business after paying that sum – the FCC wants you to submit a report supported by an “affidavit or statement under penalty of perjury” detailing how you’ve changed your ways.[2]

While this case will keep a lot of folks in the mortgage industry up at night wondering if their next, its not bad news for the industry in general. Instead, the Dynasty case provides something that has been sorely missing from the world of DNC compliance: clarity. This case sets forth clear unambiguous rules that if complied with will insure that a business will never be subject to a government forfeiture proceeding for failing to comply with the DNC laws. And the case sets forth that first and foremost in avoiding the fate of Dynasty Mortgage is the implementation of a system that documents that none of your outbound calls are in violation of the DNC laws. Documentation is the key: originators will need to be able to show that in addition to having a system in place that checks to insure that the folks they are calling are not on the DNC Registry, that they also have – in writing – a DNC compliance policy and that they’ve trained their employees how to comply with these DNC laws.[3]. And then, if a mortgage company unintentionally calls someone they shouldn’t have, and they can back up this claim of “error” by documented “evidence” of their compliance system, they will fall within the regulatory safe harbor and should not be subject to censure or fine.[4]

The Dynasty case should be a warning to the mortgage industry that backed by a Congressional mandate to clamp down on inappropriate marketing to consumers and with greater funding and resources on the horizon, the FCC and the FTC are going to be heard from a lot. These agencies will not only be calling on the likes of a Dynasty Mortgage, which clearly didn’t get it even after being warned, but also on the likes of average mortgage brokers and bankers who are simply uninformed or lax in their level of DNC compliance. And these agencies, as spelled out in the Dynasty case, will not accept “routine business practices largely consistent” with their regulatory standards.[5] Rather, they want it done right. And they want it done right now.


[1] In the Matter of Dynasty Mortgage, LLC (March 1, 2005) 28 (hereinafter “Dynasty Mortgage”).

[2] Dynasty Mortgage, ¶ ¶36-39.

[3] Dynasty Mortgage, ¶ ¶18-28.

[4] Dynasty Mortgage, ¶19.

[5] Dynasty Mortgage, ¶13.

Barry Kaye, Esq. :
Barry Kaye is based in Beverly Hills, California. He is licensed to practice law in California and New York and specializes in telecom, Internet, banking and real estate law.

barry.kaye@kfinancialgroup.com
Other Articles »

Related Articles :

  • Calling That Lead May Cost You $11,000
    Earlier last year the Federal "Do Not Call" laws were held to be constitutional. Wondering how this has any bearing on your business since "we all know" that the laws were intended to limit those nasty telemarketers who call just as the average American sits down for dinner to offer them the chance to buy a time share in Arizona or Florida.
  • Company Fined $770,000 For Calling Leads
    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a forfeiture notice to Dynasty Mortgage, LLC in the amount of $770,000 for 70 phone calls made by Dynasty to 50 consumers who were listed on the Federal Do Not Call List. According to the notice, Dynasty obtained the leads from a lead broker, who claimed the leads were scrubbed prior to Dynasty’s purchase of the lead.
  • What You Don’t Know Can Bankrupt Your Company
    If you’re one of those mortgage originators who thinks the Do Not Call (DNC) laws don’t apply to you because you’re not making cold calls or you’re only buying “scrubbed” leads, the FCC says you’d better listen up. Yes, the laws were originally enacted to curb those annoying dinnertime calls from your typical telemarketer; but the reality is these laws apply to all U.S. companies that make sales transactions over the telephone – including mortgage companies.
  • Bet You Didn’t Know That You’re a Telemarketer: Lessons from the Dynasty Mortgage Case – Part 2
    Odds are you are a telemarketer and you didn’t even know it. That’s right. According to the FCC, which recently crushed a mortgage brokerage for its failure to comply with the Do-Not-Call (DNC) laws, when it comes to DNC enforcement, the mortgage industry is sitting in the same boat as those selling Florida timeshares.
  • Calling That Lead May Cost You $11,000
    In 2004 the Federal "Do Not Call" laws were held to be constitutional. Wondering how this has any bearing on your business since "we all know" that the laws were intended to limit those nasty telemarketers who call just as the average American sits down for dinner to offer them the chance to buy a time share in Arizona or Florida.

 
Search Articles :

 

For More Mortgage Industry News
Click Here

 

Industry Directory

 

Receive FREE Industry News
Via E-mail

Email Address:
 
Breaking Headlines

 
 

Copyright © 2009 Fiscape Publications, LLC. - All Rights Reserved