About admin

admin has been a member since June 3rd 2012, and has created 14735 posts from scratch.

admin's Bio

admin's Websites

This Author's Website is

admin's Recent Articles

GSE Investors Love Treasury Turning Its Back On FHFA’s Constitutionality

As we rapidly approach the first net worth sweep of the incoming administration, it’s worth noting that the only two companies in history that have paid out net worth equity dividends as part of a plan to wind them down are Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA) and Freddie Mac (OTCQB:FMCC). These two companies support middle class America by providing counter-cyclical access to home ownership opportunities regardless of gender or race. Most commonly known for the 30-year mortgage, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been held captive for nearly a decade as they were forced by their conservator to report massive accounting losses when they were making massive cash gains in the early years of conservatorship. The intent behind forcing Fannie and Freddie to overstate losses at the time was the conservator believed that they were necessary to retroactively justify the imposition of conservatorship by forcing draws on the Senior Preferred Securities Purchase Agreement.

The problem with overstating accounting losses is that what goes around comes back around and in 2012 when the enterprises had returned to profitability the accounting writedowns were going to be reversed into massive one time accounting gains. Judges have ruled that at this time it doesn’t matter if FHFA implemented the net worth sweep to take all of this money in spite of the fact they would have to release Fannie and Freddie from conservatorship. Judges have ruled that FHFA had the authority to do whatever they wanted with the enterprises. Since then, these two conservatees have paid out their net worth to FHFA’s sister agency US Treasury. Aside from the fact they are private companies and they are accounted for like they are private companies, they’ve been treated like off-balance sheet government agencies since 2008.

Investment Thesis: There are two people who can recapitalize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA’s Melvin Watt and Treasury’s Steven Mnuchin. According to Paul Muolo of IMFNews, “Watt’s people expressed their concerns about zero capital to the Obama Treasury Department, and pushed for an increase, not a reduction.” A little over a year ago, Watt came out and expressed his concerns of zero capital. Watt always deferred to Treasury even though he could have stopped the net worth sweep on his own. Now, Steven Mnuchin is running the show at Treasury. As part of Mnuchin’s confirmation hearing, Mnuchin wrote to Senator Sherrod Brown saying “any solution will be dependent upon the GSEs being capitalized properly and other such controls that eliminate risk to taxpayers.” Watt seems to want capital. Mnuchin seems to want capital. I own preferred shares because I think that the solution is capital based. If the solution is capital based, sweeping that capital to Treasury simply is not part of the solution and that’s why it makes sense to stop this month’s net worth sweep. I’ve heard arguments saying that Mnuchin can’t stop this one because of the budget and the debt ceiling but Mnuchin has since called out the debt limit as a ‘ridiculous concept.’ All considered, I’m betting that the net worth sweep ends and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are recapitalized as early as this month.

Treasury Turns Its Back On FHFA’s Constitutionality

In light of the fact the DOJ turned around in the CFPB case, Treasury is now Turning around in the Collins case:

Footnote one is Treasury’s support of FHFA’s constitutional argument:

This puts Treasury at odds with FHFA in so far as how the Summary Judgment on Count IV will play out. This has all happened in the last six months:

The question for investors is what exactly happens to the net worth sweep that was put into place by an unconstitutionally structured federal agency? First, FHFA would have to be structured constitutionally and second the new director would have to re-review the net worth sweep:

At this point, FHFA’s Director Melvin Watt may have a different perspective on the net worth sweep than DeMarco as it was put into place before he got there and Watt seems to think capital is important.

Advocacy Letter Urges Suspension This Month

Advocacy groups got together and wrote to Watt and Mnuchin. These groups represent millions of members and span housing, building, people of color, Latin Americans, and community lenders. The fact that Trump’s tax reform proposal will cause DTA impairments is not lost on these groups:

We urge FHFA to suspend the dividend payments to the U.S. Treasury this month and allow the Enterprises to rebuild their capital buffers to avoid a draw for widely anticipated non-credit related losses at the Enterprises.

The Leadership Conference has over 200 member organizations, the largest of which has over 37,000,000 members. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Community Home Lenders Association, Community Mortgage Lenders of America, Corporation for Enterprise Development, League of United Latin American Citizens, Leading Builders of America, and the National Community Reinvestment Coalition signed on as well.

On February 2, Trump signed an executive order that would “prevent taxpayer funded bailouts” that these groups draw on for the authority to stop the sweep this month:

The premise here is that much like the financial accounting techniques that were employed earlier in conservatorship, DTA write downs are not actual credit losses. As such, if we can prevent a bailout that we know is coming by simply amending an agreement, we should do so to be consistent with Trump’s executive order.

Exploring Alternatives To Fannie And Freddie

Prior Fannie Mae CFO Timothy J Howard has proposed that some solutions proposed by GSE detractors are simply unworkable:

He does propose one workable alternative that benefits the banks instead of home buyers:

One workable solution appears to be one where the government provides emergency support to credit guarantors who abide by certain standards:

Although this is a workable solution, it’s probably not the one Mnuchin will go for since he’s been trying to get Fannie and Freddie out of government control:

Mnuchin knows how the mortgage market works and how to solve big problems and has a history of winning when he puts his money where his mouth is. As Treasury Secretary, he is empowered to protect taxpayers from bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and can easily do so simply by letting them retain their own earnings. In fact, that’s the first step to recapitalization.

Summary and Conclusion

I own 4050 shares of FMCCH, 23088 shares of FMCCP, 7370 shares of FMCCT, 1341 shares of FMCKO, 13185 shares of FMCKP, 12788 shares of FNMFN, and 5 shares of FNMFO. I own these shares because I strongly believe that the only reasonable solution involves the existing capital structures. Throwing them away presents too many challenges if they can be fixed by regulating them and operating with more capital than they used to. In fact, if you prevent FHFA from forcing Fannie and Freddie to take money from Treasury at usurious rates based on FHFA’s accounting discretion during a mortgage crisis, the amount of capital they would actually need is within range of what private capital markets could raise by issuing new equity.

Watt’s wanted to retain capital in the past. Mnuchin has in effect said that any solution requires capital. There is literally no reason in that context to take their capital away from them. Fannie and Freddie are privately owned companies and they are taxpayers. Lately, the preferred shares have dropped over 30% from their pre-Perry appeals court highs. Paulson, one of the big three preferred shareholders said that there was a high probability of resolution before the end of 2017 and that the investment was never based on the court cases.

Even if the net worth sweep dividend is stopped this month, Fannie and Freddie will remain in conservatorship until they have enough capital to exit conservatorship. I would expect the more liquid preferreds to trade between 65-85% of par in the event that the net worth sweep dividend is suspended. The reason for that is if the net worth sweep is stopped, the only option left is to put forth a recapitalization plan and I don’t see how you do that without honoring the existing capital structure.

BRIEF-Freddie Mac issues monthly volume summary for February 2017


March 23 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp

* Freddie Mac issues monthly volume summary for February
2017

* Freddie Mac – The total mortgage portfolio increased at
an annualized rate of 2.1% in february

* Freddie Mac says single-family seriously delinquent rate
decreased from 0.99% in January to 0.98% in February

* Freddie Mac – Single-family refinance-loan purchase and
guarantee volume was $14.2 billion in February

* Freddie Mac – Freddie Mac mortgage-related securities and
other mortgage-related guarantees increased at an annualized
rate of 6% in February

* Freddie Mac says multifamily delinquency rate remained
flat at 0.03% in February

* Freddie Mac – Total number of single-family loan
modifications were 2,925 in February and 6,030 for the two
months ended February 28, 2017

Source text for Eikon:
Further company coverage:

San Diego among cities requiring highest salaries to own home

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) – The cost of homeownership is San Diego is nothing new. But the sticker shock of the salary necessary to afford to live in America’s Finest City is sure to leave residents speechless.

San Diego recently ranked second among cities requiring the highest salaries needed to afford a home, according to mortgage website HSH.com. Locally, residents need to earn $113,530.43 a year, based on the medium home price of $593,000.

The salary comes in at at least twice the amount of the report’s national average of $51,962.53 a year.

San Francisco ranked first at $160,589.84 and Los Angeles placed third with $98,315.22, around San Diego. New York and Boston rounded out the top five metropolitan areas. The report is based on the country’s 27 largest metros.

“We used standard 28-percent ‘front-end’ debt ratios and a 20-percent down payment subtracted from the NAR’s [National Association of Realtors] median-home-price data to arrive at our figures,” the report stated. “We’ve incorporated available information on property taxes and homeowner’s insurance costs to more accurately reflect the income needed in a given market.”

The study noted that if a homeowner puts down 10 percent instead of 20 percent, the required annual salary jumps from $113,530.43 to $137,056.40.

San Diego’s ranking is also based on a monthly payment of $2,649.04.

“Irrespective of quarterly wobbles, thin levels of unsold inventory continue to press home prices higher. The [NAR] reported tightening supplies of unsold homes during the last three months of the year, with 4.6, 3.9 and 3.6 months of stock available to buy October, November, and December, respectively,” the report said.

Check out HSH’s map of some of the highest and lowest metros:

The cheapest metropolitan areas Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh, where a yearly salary of $32,373.50 is required to afford a home.

“The prospect of higher mortgage rates and more home shoppers in coming months should be enough of an incentive for those serious about buying to start their search now,” NAR President William E. Brown, who is also a California realtor, said.

Realities of Real Estate: A look at how the real estate market is doing

The world is always changing and, as of late, the rate of change has accelerated. Depending on your viewpoint, change can be good or bad, but one thing is for certain — it’s inevitable.

There are a variety of indices, or metrics if you will, that we follow to measure where we’ve been, and where we might be going, in the world of real estate. The performance of real estate locally might be different, but for the big picture, here are the national numbers that tell the tale of how the market is doing.

5.48 million: Every month, the National Association of Realtors reports on the number of existing homes sold nationally on a Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate. The SAAR is where they take sales for the month and, based on that data, project an annual sales figure using a pre-determined adjustment for seasonal fluctuations. The figure for February of 5.48 million isn’t a bad number, but most economists agree that sales should be above 6 million for what would be considered a healthy market. During the housing bubble, sales actually topped 7 million in 2005. Except for a brief dip during 2013, existing home sales have steadily been trending upward for the past five years.

592,000: In addition to existing home sales, it’s also important to track the pace of new construction. Those figures are also calculated on a Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate. In February, that number was 592,000, which is well below what we need to meet the needs of an ever-growing population. When the housing bubble burst, new home construction was decimated, and it has struggled to recover. Recently however, there seems to be a bit more vitality in the market for new homes. The National Association of Home Builders tracks builder confidence on a scale of 0 to 100. In January 2009, it fell to an all-time low of 8. The good news is that last month it hit a 12-year high, pushing past 70.

NAR Infographic: Housing’s Sweet 16’s

Looking to send a news release with PR Newswire?

Take advantage of the world’s leading distribution platform.

Sign up to get started

Request more information

Have an account? Log In